Home | Archived stories | News | FAQ | E-mail | Links

The Beast's Growing Teeth

by Michael G. Mickey

(5-23-05)

Daniel 7:7: After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it [was] diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.

Daniel 7:23: Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.

Bible prophecy likens the revived Roman empire - today's European Union - to a dreadful and terrible all-devouring beast. Is that an accurate view of the current EU, given the European Union's reputation for being all talk and no action, especially in the aftermath of the latest Iraq war? Perhaps not, but I promise you that's about to change - and quickly.

While the EU is not presently known for its great iron teeth, the EU Observer is reporting EU defense ministers have taken some more steps towards the creation of the bloc's rapid reaction 'battle groups' by deciding to speed up the bloc's notoriously slow decision-making process at the request of the European Union's foreign policy chief, Dr. Javier Solana.

Solana's proposal speeds the process by forcing defense ministers to agree to make a decision to deploy forces to a region within five days then insure the forces are on the ground at the trouble spot within ten short days. In terms of military warfare, that is lightning fast!

The EU Observer's report not only indicates decisions are going to be made quicker, but tells us Germany has signed itself up to support two more battle groups of 1,500 or so troops each, along with with France and Spain as well as Poland, Slovakia, Lithuania and Latvia. The first of these newest battle groups will be ready in the second half of 2008 and the second during the first half of 2010. Additionally, the report states a Nordic group comprised of Estonia, Finland, Sweden and non-EU members Iceland and Norway should have battle groups up and running in 2008. All these forces, according to the report, will be expected to be "worthy representatives of the European Union".

Clearly, as we can see from the EU Observer report, the EU is going to be a major military power in the not-too-distant future, but what about right now? Is the EU a credible military force? An article written by Dr. Javier Solana himself, dated 5-23-05, is quite revealing. In it, Solana states the following, in part:

Within the space of five years, the European Union has moved from rhetoric to action in matters of security and defence. Operational capacities have been planned, deployed and tested. Military missions have been launched in the Balkans and in Africa. More than 50,000 troops from EU member states are deployed on peacekeeping missions. These actions are guided by a European security strategy that seeks a secure Europe in a better world. Matching our defence capabilities to our ambitions and obligations will be a key challenge in the years ahead.

European leaders have unanimously defined the task. It is to transform their militaries into more flexible, mobile forces and enable them to address new threats. That means spending more or spending better. Now, we struggle to sustain less than 5 per cent of our overall military manpower on vital peace-support tasks. This seems a poor return on the Euros 160bn (Pounds 110bn) that the member states between them spend on defence each year. So today in Brussels, EU defence ministers will not only review current military operations. Crucially, as board members of the European Defence Agency, they will also consider how Europe can ensure that a strong defence sector can equip its militaries with the necessary capabilities in the decades to come.

There are 50,000 EU troops deployed around the globe in peacekeeping missions alone and they're adding more all the time! The EU is not only adding more troops, it's also looking to get more armored fighting vehicles on the ground by 2010-2015. The EU is militarizing and quickly, looking to match its defense capabilities to its ambitions, as stated by Solana.

In case there is any doubt in anyone's mind regarding Europe's intentions, let me state what the EU's ambition is: To surpass the United States in global influence, prestige and economic power by 2010! All the EU's battle groups currently being planned will be up and running by when? 2010. Coincidence? I wouldn't bet on it.

To be clear, the EU's ambition isn't based solely on an opinion of mine, as anyone can easily research and discover on the worldwide web. Dated October 11, 2004, an article by The Golden Dollar's Frank Selvaggi is supportive of what I've stated. Selvaggi wrote, in part:

To most, Lisbon is just the capital Portugal. To Europeans, Lisbon means far more. Lisbon, short for the Lisbon Agenda, is Europe’s grand ten-year plan to surpass the United States as the world’s foremost economic power.

Created in 2000, the Lisbon Accord set out a roadmap for Europe to achieve the lofty goal of unseating the United States. Now at the end of 2004, Europe is evaluating its progress.
Selvaggi, as many others I've seen write on the topic, doesn't foresee the EU surpassing the US as the world's foremost economic power by 2010, but ends his commentary with a stern warning very similar to the one I've issued on this website repeatedly:
Watch out, America. The threat of being second-best has never been greater. And if the Old Continent has its way, the Red, White, and Blue’s days are numbered.

The EU's goal of surpassing the US economically may seem impossible by 2010, but that's only if the balance of global power isn't interrupted by anything dramatic --- like the Rapture of the Church, for instance. If tomorrow the Rapture of the Church should come, which world power would be hit hardest? If you think it would impact any world power on the level it would the United States, you need to do some research on how the Body of Christ is faring in atheistic Russia, secularist Europe, and Asia (particularly communist China, Vietnam, and North Korea) and the Muslim nations of the Middle East and North Africa, all of whom are going to play prominent roles in the Tribulation Period to come. The United States on the other hand? Mum's the biblical word, at least as far as I can tell.

Who would walk away from the Rapture of the Church in the best position to lead the world in this time of crisis? Economically, the EU would. Militarily, the EU would as well, in my opinion. Why? Because of NATO, of course! The West would circle the wagons and pose a strong enough deterrent to hold off the Russians, Arabs, and Asians briefly, but only long enough for them to get organized in the ensuing chaos of the seven-year Tribulation Period, getting the ball rolling swiftly toward Armageddon.

Am I just being silly? There are plenty of people who would say so. In fact, plenty of people do. I'm okay with that, however, as the end result will prove who was right and who was wrong.

The Bible tells us the final empire that will rule the world under the leadership of the Antichrist is rising in the form of the European Union. We're told this empire will eventually, if not now, be like a beast with great iron teeth!

The iron teeth of the fourth beast, which the Lord revealed to the prophet Daniel through visions in the night, are growing --- and fast!

Keep looking up!

Home | Archived stories | News | FAQ | E-mail | Links

©2005 RaptureAlert.com. All rights reserved.

  Site Meter

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.